NURS 6051 Assignment The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies Sample 2

NURS 6051 Assignment The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies Sample 2

Information technology has had a significant impact on the development and implementation of healthcare services. Through information technology, service providers can easily and efficiently deliver quality healthcare. Existing research evidence has proven that health information technology improves healthcare delivery in different ways, including improving compliance to regulatory standards, minimizing medical errors, and minimizing adverse reactions. However, health organizations should select the best information technology to minimize waste and increase effectiveness. This review summarizes the currently available evidence about the impact of health information technology on improving patients’ quality of care and safety.

Kruse, C. S., & Beane, A. (2018). Health information technology continues to affect medical outcomes positively: a systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research, 20(2), e8793. https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/8793,

This article seeks to evaluate the impact of health information technology on health outcomes. It explores various elements of health information technology, such as health records management and health information systems. The study is based on the background that various adverse outcomes within the hospital’s information system can lead to patients’ morbidity or mortality, increasing the cost of healthcare.

The study relied on a systematic literature review methodology to identify and review evidence on health information technology, retrieving journal articles from CINAHL and MEDLINE. The review was structured as Primary Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and completed using the Assessment for Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).

The search yielded 37 studies for final review, 81% of the reviewed journals revealing that health information technology had at least one improved medical impact. This supports the study’s hypothesis that there is a positive association between the adoption of health information systems and medical outcomes.

Menachemi, N., Rahurkar, S., Harle, C. A., & Vest, J. R. (2018). The benefits of health information exchange: an updated systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(9), 1259-1265.https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy035

Health information exchange through health information technology has contributed to reduced costs and improved quality of care. This study aimed to rigorously evaluate the evidence that health information exchange has positive effects and benefits on the delivery of healthcare services. The study took the form of a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, retrieving peer-reviewed journal articles from Scopus and PubMed databases.

All the 24 reviewed studies reported beneficial effects of health information exchange through health information technology. Some of the benefits found by the survey include reduced imaging, lower costs, reduced duplicated procedures, and improved patient safety. This article is helpful in providing evidence about how healthcare providers can utilize health information technology to facilitate health information exchange for purposes of interprofessional teamwork.

Young, R., Burge, S., Kumar, K., Wilson, J., & Ortiz, D. (2018). A time-motion study of primary care physicians’ work in the electronic health record era. Family medicine, 50(2), 91-99. DOI: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.184803

While electronic health records have been appreciated for improving efficiency in the healthcare system, other critics claim electronic health records negatively impact the time providers take to care for patients. This study sought to update previous research on the time taken by providers to care for patients in the clinic using electronic health records.

The researchers used direct observations to observe family physician attendings, residents, and ambulatory patients in 982 visits. The researchers then measured total visit time, face-to-face time, pre-visit chart time, out-of-hours electronic health records time and total electronic health records work time.

The study r